<iframe title = “Calvine {113} – Possible Debunk” width=”580” height=”385” src=”https://www.youtube.com/embed/w3oZtjbAOYc?autoplay=1&modestbranding=1” frameborder=”0” allowfullscreen>iframe>
<br>I think I might have cracked the Calvine {113} photo. I am not saying that I‘m 100% convinced – but it‘s a possibility. I used raytracing to simulate how reflections work and this is what I came up with. Let‘s discuss!
<br><a href=”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w3oZtjbAOYc“>sourcea>
Calvine UFO – Possible Debunk
I saw this photo one time and knew immediately it was a rock in water. The reflection makes the rock look like a ufo. The “plane” could be a toy plane or bird. It’s also ironic how the famous picture of Nessie was also faked in a similar manner. I’m a believer in UFOs but I also believe that a lot of people have faked ufo pictures throughout history. This is one of them.
Stones float? lmao you debunkers are worst than the alien crazy people. It’s a sad life.
Could well be a LTA unmanned craft i have worked on similar in my job.
Totally beyonds words. One of the easiest debunks I've seen. The only easier UFO debunk in my memory was one I was involved with. Years ago, hanging around with a fellow physics grad student, someone shows us a photo of outdoors, a house, trees, nothing unusual, but a fuzzy gray oval in the sky. Film defect? Out of focus. We didn't know enough about f-stops and so forth, left the issue hanging open. But the next photograph… the guy's dog indoors, on the kitchen floor – the exact same fuzzy gray oval! Dust on the lens.
FAKE .. pull up the image & zoom in around the jet, there is a CLEAR, perfectly shaped rectangle of pixalating around it. There is also a faint hint of it around the object. Copy & Paste.
❌️ At least view the witness footage first❗️👍🔻
https://youtu.be/aMdrdCMFRnA
Cool visualization.
My version in Blender (with soundtrack!) 😀
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lxgGEds0Ipk
Super simplified render with everything to the scale of apprx. a guy in a boat in front of an island.
When you flip the picture around, you're actually not including the fence that would still be at the bottom of the photo, though. The Full Photo shows the fence running from left to right.
Of course it's a fake photo.
It's always that way.
This theory borders on absurd, because there were credible eyewitnesses involved who reported seeing an object and it ascended upwards at a high rate of speed. In addition, the pictured object is of a symmetrical structure that does not rule out a natural object or reflection of said object, but highly unlikely given the sharp defined angles.
I don’t know where to begin with this. It’s so desperate. Just accept it’s a genuine ufo. They are real
That is definitely real seen this type of ufo before,it stopped so fast and just floated for a couple second ,it was so chrome, it took of super fast
This photo was highly analyzed by UK Ministry of Defense imagery experts (the best in the world) using a large print and a high powered imagery loupe. It was analyzed for scale, lighting, color, direction and texture. The best analysts in the world essentially validated it's authenticity including identifying the plane (a Harrier) in the photo. The resurface photo itself has been analyzed by Andrew Robinson, Senior Photography Lecturer at Sheffield Hallam stating " 'My conclusion is that the object is definitely in front of the camera, that is, it's not a fake produced in post-production, and its placement within the scene appears to be approximately halfway between the foreground fence and the plane in the background." The MOD actually went to so far as to prepare responses to the photo anticipating it's release which… never happened. This is a release of one small scale photograph that does not truly represent the full print capacity of the original negative and, it is confirmed by multiple sources that 5 other pictures existed. The British Ministry of Defense and the National Archives of the UK have admitted to have place the photos in storage with a release date of 2076. If the MOD had truly determined these were a flat out hoax or at all questionable in their authenticity, why do this? The reason given was "Privacy concerns" ???? Speculation still abounds on just what this is but, the one thing that is not a matter of speculation is that the photo is authentic, not a fabrication and nothing in it at all indicates a "reflection". Here is a picture of the very spot the pics were taken from here … https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2022/08/12/18/61333227-11106737-image-a-13_1660325862961.jpg. Respect for the efforts to question this from an out of the box perspective but, it just doesn't hold up. What is in the photo is still inconclusive. Some believe it could actually be the best evidence of the fabled Aurora Aircraft program while others feel it is an extraterrestrial craft but the photo is real and not a hoax.
Nick Pope had a large full colour photo on his office wall. I doubt he would not have been able to spot a rock.
I regret that I inadvertently gave you a view. A still pond in the Scottish Highlands is far more preposterous than a UFO.
Why would the ministry of defence classify photos of a rock for 50 years?
Definitely a stone in a puddle or pond
A kite.
Imagine reaching this far for a photo that MI5 wanted classified for 75 years and still
technically is classified AND not being able to figure out that it is in fact a reflection in a pond. The top brass we have to offer in protecting our country and they couldn’t figure out a reflection in a pond…..
I know a few people that have made lights in the sky videos that are fake but you always have morons that think they're real and claim it is evidence of aliens what you do is you get a very clean piece of glass and set it up in front of the camera and then behind the camera it needs to be dark and then behind the camera you can have small little bitty lights that you can move around all you want and it will reflect off the piece of glass back to the camera lens….. voila you have lights in the sky. There are a few videos that you can tell that's what it is especially when you see the light is kind of wobbling a little bit which is the piece of glass that's actually wobbling