<iframe title = “Rex Heflin talks about his famous 1965 {113} photos and how they got confiscated” width=”580” height=”385” src=”https://www.youtube.com/embed/rzVgrCCVpH0?autoplay=1&modestbranding=1” frameborder=”0” allowfullscreen>iframe>
<br>August 3, 1965. Santa Ana, California.
“Reanalysis of the 1965 Heflin {113} Photos”
<a href=”https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.552.6587&rep=rep1&{92}=pdf” target=”_blank“>https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.552.6587&rep=rep1&{92}=pdfa>
————
If you appreciate the content on my {32} and would like to support me, please visit:
<a href=”https://www.buymeacoffee.com/eyesoncineW” target=”_blank“>https://www.buymeacoffee.com/eyesoncineWa>
Thanks, EOC
THIS {84} IS FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSE ONLY!
FAIR USE PRINCIPLES UNDER SECTION 107 OF THE COPYRIGHT ACT.
<br><a href=”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rzVgrCCVpH0“>sourcea>
If you appreciate the content on my channel and would like to support me, please visit:
https://www.buymeacoffee.com/eyesoncineW
Thanks, EOC
Bob Lazar claimed one of the nine UFOs he saw in the hangar looked like a straw hat. That's a similar description of what was photographed here.
It is some object caught inside a dust devil. Look at swirling debris near the ground in the first photo.
awesome channel
This is the one video most important to me in terms of the UFO topic.
Wow, I never knew there was an interview with him.
look like the ufo shape constantly change to more advanced shape
Another truthful encounter. That famous shot is well known. Interestingly there has been no mention of falsehood in this documentary, Pete, Newcastle, Australia..
What do you think, Jesus?
Very valuable witness.
What a story. And he gets a call telling him to check his mailbox! Those photos are excellent and Rex seems like a great guy.
What was that last thing he said?? "Not even …(what)?"
Anyone able to make that out? Thx
notice those types of photos… the underside is always completely black….if they were all fake…why would anyone think to do that ? 🤔
These photos were studied by Bruce McCabee (Navy optical physicist) years ago and were deemed genuine by him. No trickery involved, no wires, just good farmers who never gained financially from the release.
it would appear that Rex Heflin 1) photographed an odd-shaped and silent experimental aircraft that in the 58 years since has not been reportedly seen again or identified; 2) he perpetrated an amazing hoax that no one yet has unraveled; or 3) he was fortunate enough to have taken several clear pictures of a genuine unidentified flying object.
You decide.
saw a progrom on history where they used computer model to estimate size of object and distance from vehicle…..it matched heflin's estimation and description
I wonder why the shape of UFOs changed over the years. I mean this UFO looks like a Typical Saucer people imagine in the 50s.
Maybe because it's a man made military vehicle?And just like cars the shape changed over the years ?
This one was in bay 4 at s4.
You have to wonder why they gave him the original photos back, and how they found him so many years later. I believe they wanted him to tell his story to the public again. This time with the real photos, to get the public used to the idea so that when they eventually disclose the truth, we, the public, do not panic. A soft disclosure as they say.
Incredible shots 🤩👍
Why do pictures of ufos from the 6os,look like ufos from the 60s?
Well the gov. kept up with his every move it looks like. They finally returned his pics. How weird they do it by hand and even call him. Why after all that time I wonder. I always remember these pics, but never seen the guy who took them nor interviews with him. Thanks EOC
i would give fuck all to any gov agency re; this subject.
100% Swamp gas
Releasing all this footage gots to be a social experiment for those willing to partake,lend an ear, give a view ‼️ I'm sure the government combing the comments for exquisite info,, or has a computer program to do so ‼️
Absolutely legendary interview!
The are clear and up close pictures, exactly what skeptics demand. But when they do get them, they label them as hoaxes. I was skeptical of these pictures too, but after seeing the interviews it seems legit to me.