Huh. I wasn't thinking sailboat when I first saw it. (My guess was a car's taillights and some weird refraction to get the two levels.) Well done.
In Crowe's defense, I can certainly see why he might say, "…the hell is THAT?!" upon seeing the images and pass it around–or maybe he just thought they were cool and others hyped it as a UFO. Either way…
Anyway you could do a video on the nimrods that are now claiming Augusts solar eclipse has anything to do with the this stupid notion that nibiru is coming hahahahaha
Thank you for this video. I see soooooo many people including so called "Paranormal Investigators" claiming these kinds of light streaks are paranormal related. I am a photographer but you don't need to be one to know this is not paranormal. Lens flares, light streaks from long exposures, moisture in the air with flash at night, etc…..these all have been claimed to be supernatural. This doesn't include all the trickery going on, especially with UFO's. I believe in the paranormal, but this is not it. Come on people, open your eyes!!!!
hummm makes sense. i think you did solve it. ufo do not look like that. I bet you cant debunk the vid "ufos attack the fort worth base in texas" that is a unexplainable and when i mean that its that we vsnt because we are far behind anything we can comprehend if we are or if aliens are a thousand years ahead of our time there is just no way we can understand them some of us humans think we can because we think we are slightly more intelligent than others but we're not like that guy Marco d'antonio he gets 80% of them right but the 20 or maybe 30% he can't I bet he would say it's the light from a camera or how he always says it's flying debris.
a time lapse can also be a long exposure (like we see in this video), you should read up more about it. Honestly this video is a lot of speculation that cannot be proved.
Another one solved/debunked. The amount of work you must put into these vids. I sure appriciate it! And what you do is really needed, if anyone should ask me. ( Not su#king your Di#k – just telling it, like I sez it 😉 ). Againe thanks! On to the next one. C. (DK).
Wonder why the skipper was running with the ANCHOR light (top of main mast) on. The STEAMING light, used when running under power at night, is usually locate at the first spreader about 1/2 way up the mast.
Your explanation is plausible and well presented – and I have no issue with it, but I find myself asking isn't it sad that it should be necessary? Even without any clue as to what was captured, i'd expect any being capable of using a camera and not peeing their pants to simply look at their exposures and think "Aw poop, something got in the way". Even if taken somewhere presumed remote with little chance of this happening (clearly not the case in an urban waterfront) environment – doesn't Occam's razor dictate that you've more likely captured a kid's $20 R/C drone – or just about anything rather mundane – than ET's coupe?
Not that any of this is a slight towards yourself or your presentation. I love anyone with an actual functional brain that isn't ready to call Oprah over the Elvis toast, and straight faced debunkers allow me a sigh of relief. That anyone would possibly mistake this for anything other than a logically explainable earthly photo artifact is the part that makes my head hurt.
This one came up I like this one
damn this vid is old
Fake
Just watched this for the first time. Excellent breakdown Phil! 😉👍
Cool breakdown! Thank you.
MAKIN MOOVIES, SINGIN SONGS, AND FIGHTIN ROUND THE WORLD!
Huh. I wasn't thinking sailboat when I first saw it. (My guess was a car's taillights and some weird refraction to get the two levels.) Well done.
In Crowe's defense, I can certainly see why he might say, "…the hell is THAT?!" upon seeing the images and pass it around–or maybe he just thought they were cool and others hyped it as a UFO. Either way…
Excellent work, I applaud you..!
I hope Russell doesn't beat you up!
Aliens r real though
That's not a sailboat. It's a reflection of a red colored blacklight in crowes house
Nice work. Good analysis.
It's a Bigfoot Mothership …. AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGH!
I get a lot of people on my channel saying they see stuff that I can't see. People believe what they want to it seems, regardless.
P.S love they way you narrate videos
Anyway you could do a video on the nimrods that are now claiming Augusts solar eclipse has anything to do with the this stupid notion that nibiru is coming hahahahaha
issitfree
xadweijssjyouwoulddaayrrkokojppulijljljmessigwithmyphon
Parabreakdown ? more like AparaNerds. Ahahaha. 😉
Thank you for this video. I see soooooo many people including so called "Paranormal Investigators" claiming these kinds of light streaks are paranormal related. I am a photographer but you don't need to be one to know this is not paranormal. Lens flares, light streaks from long exposures, moisture in the air with flash at night, etc…..these all have been claimed to be supernatural. This doesn't include all the trickery going on, especially with UFO's. I believe in the paranormal, but this is not it. Come on people, open your eyes!!!!
good work, common sense.
this blokes chatting shit it aint off no boat
According to Russell Crowe himself he swares its a genuine ufo and that he was visited in Australia
THAILBOAT!
hummm makes sense. i think you did solve it. ufo do not look like that. I bet you cant debunk the vid "ufos attack the fort worth base in texas" that is a unexplainable and when i mean that its that we vsnt because we are far behind anything we can comprehend if we are or if aliens are a thousand years ahead of our time there is just no way we can understand them some of us humans think we can because we think we are slightly more intelligent than others but we're not like that guy Marco d'antonio he gets 80% of them right but the 20 or maybe 30% he can't I bet he would say it's the light from a camera or how he always says it's flying debris.
a time lapse can also be a long exposure (like we see in this video), you should read up more about it. Honestly this video is a lot of speculation that cannot be proved.
1:10 GASP! REAL PICTURES OF REAL GHOSTS CAUGHT ON CAMERA!!!
Another one solved/debunked.
The amount of work you must put into these vids.
I sure appriciate it!
And what you do is really needed, if anyone should ask me.
( Not su#king your Di#k – just telling it, like I sez it 😉 ).
Againe thanks! On to the next one.
C. (DK).
Wonder why the skipper was running with the ANCHOR light (top of main mast) on. The STEAMING light, used when running under power at night, is usually locate at the first spreader about 1/2 way up the mast.
Your explanation is plausible and well presented – and I have no issue with it, but I find myself asking isn't it sad that it should be necessary? Even without any clue as to what was captured, i'd expect any being capable of using a camera and not peeing their pants to simply look at their exposures and think "Aw poop, something got in the way". Even if taken somewhere presumed remote with little chance of this happening (clearly not the case in an urban waterfront) environment – doesn't Occam's razor dictate that you've more likely captured a kid's $20 R/C drone – or just about anything rather mundane – than ET's coupe?
Not that any of this is a slight towards yourself or your presentation. I love anyone with an actual functional brain that isn't ready to call Oprah over the Elvis toast, and straight faced debunkers allow me a sigh of relief. That anyone would possibly mistake this for anything other than a logically explainable earthly photo artifact is the part that makes my head hurt.
Going to watch some more of your vids now.